Conscientious objection may become ‘indefensible’, says WHO

The moral principle of conscientious objection (CO) has been severely criticised by the World Health Organisation as a major obstacle to making abortion freely available. This would further undermine the position of pro-life doctors and nurses.

The latest abortion guidelines from the WHO declared that conscientious objection, “continues to operate as a barrier to access to quality abortion care … If it proves impossible to regulate conscientious objection in a way that respects, protects and fulfils abortion seekers’ rights, conscientious objection in abortion provision may become indefensible.”

Therefore, it recommends a series of restrictive measure to counteract its operation. These include: ensuring the health care systems employ sufficient abortion providers; regulating CO and penalising non-compliance; banning institutional claims of conscience; requiring doctors with CO to refer patients to doctors who will do abortions; banning CO in urgent or emergency situations.

Furthermore, WHO paints a dark picture of the supposedly toxic effects on women, on doctors, and on health systems. They say: “Where there are many objectors, non-objecting health workers have an increased workload, abortion provision is often stigmatised, and those who do provide abortion care may experience career limitation or discrimination”.

The Iona Institute
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

You can adjust all of your cookie settings by navigating the tabs on the left hand side.