Government’s children’s rights wording “diluted”, says Barnardos

The Government’s proposed children’s rights amendment has been criticised by children’s charity Barnardos.

Their criticism comes after reports said that the wording agreed between the office for the Minister for Children and the Attorney General would not give social workers more power to intervene in families and would not give agencies a right to sue the State on behalf of children.

Barnardos chief executive Fergus Finlay said that the new wording was a “dilution” of the wording agreed by an Oireachtas committee.

Mr Finlay said Barnardos would provide detailed written comments to Mr Andrews this week outlining its position on the new wording, according to a report in the Irish Times. But he said at first glance the proposed wording seemed substantially different to what was proposed by the Oireachtas committee and represented quite a dilution of these rights.

He said he had particular concerns about moving certain commitments on rights to children to article 45, which is non-judiciable.

“If it is non-judiciable then it isn’t a right,” he said.

Last February an Oireachtas committee chaired by Fianna Fáil TD Mary O’Rourke produced a report agreed by all the main parties setting out a text.

However, several Government departments raised concerns about the committee’s proposals, fearing they could prevent the deportation of parents unlawfully in the State and entitle children faced with expulsion from schools to legal representation.

The Government’s wording for the amendment recognises the rights of all children but does not contain a provision that would allow the State be sued in order to have economic or social specific rights vindicated.

The commitment to the general welfare of children is expressed in only aspirational terms, and will be in article 45 of the Constitution, headed “Directive Principles of Social Policy”.

The Fine Gael front bench is due to take a formal position on the new wording shortly.

Fine Gael spokesman on children Charlie Flanagan said yesterday it was regrettable the consensus agreed at the committee had not been followed to the letter. But Fine Gael broadly welcomed the Government’s initiative. It favoured holding the referendum as soon as possible.

The Iona Institute
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

You can adjust all of your cookie settings by navigating the tabs on the left hand side.