News Roundup

Sinn Féin continues to push for same-sex marriage in NI

Even as political deadlock prevents the operation of the Northern Ireland Assembly, Mary Lou McDonald, the recently elected President of Sinn Féin, has reissued a call for same-sex marriage to be introduced in the North.

Speaking at an event at Queens University Belfast, Ms McDonald said “the rights of Irish speakers as agreed in St Andrews, the legacy mechanisms agreed in Stormont House and the right to marriage equality – available in the South and across Britain – remain” and “cannot be further delayed”.

She added: “A right delayed is a right denied. It is time to move on, to implement the agreements and to secure these rights”.

Ms McDonald issued her call as identical private members’ bills are being tabled in the House of Lords and the House of Commons this week, one by a Conservative peer Lord Hayward and the other by a Labour MP, Conor McGinn, a native of south Armagh to redefine marriage in the North of Ireland over and above the objections of political leaders in the North.

Read more...

Stay-at-home parents to miss out, again in child-care scheme

An expert report on childminding will be presented to Katherine Zappone, the children’s minister, and will recommend an expansion of the Government’s affordable childcare scheme so that up to 700 additional childminders might be covered by it. The report, however, is expected to come out against supports or payments to family members looking after children. It will also recommend that au pairs and nannies should remain outside the support programmes. Ms Zappone is expected to accept the recommendations.
The Stay-at-Home Parents’ Association has said that the new measures were pricing stay-at-home parents out of the market and depriving them of the choice to raise their children as full-time parents because they were not receiving financial assistance available to parents using childcare.
Read more...

Repeal side lead cut by 10 points says latest poll

A new Red C poll on abortion in the Sunday Business Post found there has been a ten point cut in support for repealing Eighth amendment since January. The findings show that 56% of respondents are in favour of repeal, 26% are opposed, 16% don’t know and 2% refused to answer the question. On the issue of support for abortion up to twelve weeks, the poll found that 52% are in favour, 33% are opposed, 13% don’t know and 2% refused to give a preference.
According to the Pro Life Campaign the poll reflects very much what pro-life canvassers are picking up on the ground. PLC spokesperson Cora Sherlock said that for several weeks the Government has attempted to present its proposal as restrictive, but the public is starting to realise “that repeal would, in fact, introduce abortion on wide-ranging grounds”.
She concluded: “There will no doubt be fluctuations in the polls between now and referendum day but I am increasingly confident that the momentum is moving towards the pro-life side.”
Niamh UiBhriain of the Savethe8th campaign said: “One trend is clear both in polling, and from our experience talking to real voters: The more the public find out about this abortion proposal, the less they like it“. She said the Government is proposing abortion for any reason up to 12 weeks, and a carbon copy of the UK model after 12 weeks, and concluded: “As more and more voters discover the actual content of the Government’s proposals, they will turn away from the YES side in greater numbers. Irish people do not want a UK-style abortion regime, but that is what they are being asked to vote for.”
Read more...

Govt legislation to restrict third-trimester abortions

The Government are planning to limit abortions up to birth  to those pregnancies where the unborn child is diagnosed with a life-limiting condition. For terminations after 12 weeks, for reasons impacting the physical or mental health of the mother, the legislation will allow abortion up to the point of viability, around the 23rd or 24th week of the pregnancy. This is the same as as in Britain where a fifth of pregnancies end in abortion for so-called ‘health’ reasons. After that, as the pregnancy enters the third trimester, a request for a termination on those same grounds will be accomplished by early delivery of the child, rather than the intentional killing of the child via abortion.
Read more...

Doctors says proposed abortion regime ‘has nothing to do with healthcare’

The proposal to have a GP-led system providing abortion on request up to 12 weeks into a pregnancy is “the exact opposite” of what healthcare professionals are trained to do, a new group called ‘Medical Alliance for the Eighth’ has said.
“Abortion is life-ending. It is never life-saving. This proposal is about opening the door to wide-ranging abortion and nothing more,” Dr Siobhán Crowley, a GP, told a press conference in Dublin yesterday on behalf of the organisation.
“As doctors and as healthcare professionals we believe it is wholly unacceptable and unsafe to hastily push through plans without consideration of the implications”.
She added that there is “widespread opposition and concern” within the medical profession over what the Government is proposing.
Dr Crowley said the repeal of the Eighth Amendment would “lead to abortion on demand in Ireland and to an abortion regime that is more extreme than in Britain, where one in five pregnancies end in abortion.”

Read more...

Sinn Féin expels female TD for voting against Repeal Referendum

Sinn Féin TD Carol Nolan has been expelled from the party for three months for opposing the party’s position on the Eighth Amendment.
Ms Nolan, a TD for Offaly-North Tipperary, voted against the bill to hold a referendum to repeal the right to life of unborn children in the Dáil on Wednesday.
She told the assembled members the recent ruling of the Supreme Court was a “wake-up call” to all in the State. “We are faced with a clear decision in the forthcoming referendum. We can chose to retain the eighth amendment, which is the only legal protection for unborn babies under which doctors in Irish hospitals protect the lives of both patients – the mother and the baby – or we can repeal the eighth amendment and face the prospect of abortion being normalised in this State,” she said.
“I believe that the deletion of 40.3.3° from the Constitution, which would remove the right to life of the unborn, would be a very regressive step, and one which we as a society will live to regret. Every child has the basic, fundamental right to life, and that right to life is non-negotiable. We should cherish and uphold this fundamental right, and we should not repeat or replicate the mistakes of England or other countries where abortion has been normalised and liberalised.”

Read more...

‘Single-sex toilets needed to overcome girls’ barriers to education,’ says Unesco

Unesco is urging governments around the world to prioritise providing single-sex toilets in schools, warning as many as 1 in 10 girls in some countries are missing out on lessons because of their period.
The UN’s education body surveyed 189 countries as part of its sixth annual gender review, and one “obstacle” to girls attending school was a lack of segregated toilets in schools, review director Manos Antoninis said, adding the agency found there was “little focus” on menstrual hygiene in schools in 21 low and middle income countries.
“Improved sanitation to address adolescent girls’ concerns over privacy, particularly during menstruation, can influence their education decisions,” he said.
“Single-sex toilets are desperately needed to overcome girls’ barriers to education.” The news comes as proponents of gender ideology, often working hand in glove with the UN and prominent NGOs, are denying the importance of bodily sex in favour of a mental concept of gender. This ideology would see toilets segregated according to one’s gender identity, rather than bodily sex as a means of pusuing a new understanding o equality. However, such changes in favour of a new understanding of equality would end up harming the most vulnerable, and set back the cause of women’s education considerably.
Read more...

Demand for American sperm is skyrocketing in Brazil

Over the past seven years, human semen imports from the U.S. to Brazil have surged some 3,000% as more rich single women and lesbian couples select donors whose online profiles suggest they will yield light-complexioned and preferably blue-eyed children.
According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, everyone wants a “pretty kid” and for many would-be-parents in Brazil, where prejudice often runs deep, that means “the white biotype—light-colored eyes and skin,” said Susy Pommer, a 28-year-old data analyst from São Paulo who decided to get pregnant last year after a breast-cancer scare left her eager to raise a child right away with her partner, Priscilla.
Money is also a factor with carefully categorized and genetically vetted sperm from U.S. providers has to be procured from Brazilian fertility clinics at a cost of some $1,500 a vial, whereas many Brazilians simply don’t trust their own national product. Unlike in the U.S., it is illegal to pay men to donate their sperm here, so domestic stocks are low and information about Brazilian donors sparse. “It basically says ‘brown eyes, brown hair, likes hamburgers’ and what their zodiac sign is—that’s it,” said Alessandra Oliva, 31, of the information available on local donors. She has 29 pages of information on the American father of her 14-month-old son, from a photo of him as a child to genetic tests for cystic fibrosis.
In 2016, heterosexual couples bought 41% of Brazil’s imported sperm, single women purchased 38% and lesbian couples bought 21%, but demand is growing fastest among the latter two groups. In particular, more lesbian couples are seeking sperm donors after recent regulatory changes made it easier to register a child in both of their names.
Read more...

PLC condemns as ‘crass and insensitive’ launch of abortion campaign on grounds of Rotunda Maternity Hospital

The Pro Life Campaign has described as “crass and insensitive” the decision of a political group to launch its campaign for repeal of the Eighth Amendment in the Pillar Room of the Rotunda Hospital on Thursday.
Dr Ruth Cullen of the Pro Life Campaign said the group in question are desperate to disguise the fact that repeal equals abortion on demand and ends a child’s life, and added that, in her view, “it is a crass and insensitive move to launch a campaign in support of ending human life, next to a maternity hospital where mothers and babies are being cared for”. She continued: “The Government’s proposal to allow abortion up to 3 months for any reason is not healthcare. Rather it represents a total abandonment of respect for human life at its most fragile and dependent beginnings.
“Regardless of where the repeal side launches its campaign, nothing can hide the awful reality that without the life-saving Eighth Amendment the door to wide-ranging abortion would be opened and there would be no going back.”
The Rotunda Hospital tried to distance themselves from the launch, telling the Irish Times, that the venue in question was managed by the Rotunda Foundation, the official fundraising arm of the Rotunda Hospital, and is completely independent of the Rotunda Hospital with its own separate board and executive. A spokesperson added: “The Rotunda Hospital has no influence or control over the operation of the Pillar Room. The Rotunda Hospital wishes to make it clear that it does not support any political organisation or agenda.”
Read more...

Italian birth certs to record two women as progenitors of child

A Court in Italy has ruled for the first time that two women should be named as the parents of a child on its birth certificate, with both specifically recognised as mothers, even though only one is naturally the mother of the child. No father is to be mentioned on the birth cert. The Court’s reasoning also raised eyebrows for claiming that not recognising both women as mothers on the certificate would “violate the fundamental rights of the child”. The lower court in Pisa that issued the ruling will now await confirmation from the Italian Constitutional Court before implementing its decree, as the judgement is contrary to legislation in this matter that expressly prohibited what the judge ruled is required by justice.

Read more...