News Roundup

Same-sex marriage supporters rise to defend Ashers Bakery in ‘compelled speech’ case

Family-run Ashers Baking Company should not be forced to promote a cause which its owners profoundly disagree with, a columnist says. Writing in the Belfast Telegraph, Fionola Meredith said Ashers’ situation was “not a case of anti-gay discrimination” because the row is over a message – not an individual. Meredith explained that she supports same-sex marriage but disagrees with earlier court rulings against the Christian bakers viewing it as an issue of compelled speech rather than gay rights. “No company should be under any obligation to facilitate the dissemination of beliefs that are antithetical to the ethos of that business. . . . The message itself – not the customer requesting it – has always been the issue for Ashers.”

The columnist described the long-running legal case brought by the Equality Commission for Northern Ireland as “costly, vexatious and divisive”. She said it was not equality to force everyone to “disseminate political beliefs that they fundamentally disagree with”.

“It is not tolerance. It is not freedom. If Ashers lose this week, we all lose”.

Read more...

Church of England split over US plan to remove ‘husband and wife’ from marriage service

The Anglican communion is sharply divided over plans by The Episcopal Church (TEC) in the US to change its marriage service to a gay-friendly version which would remove “husband and wife” and “procreation” from the marriage service.

The new service removes the phrase “the union of husband and wife” and replaces it with “the union of two people”, and replaces the section which talks about part of God’s intention for marriage being “for the procreation of children” with the phrase “for the gift of children” to make it more relevant for same-sex couples who may wish to adopt. Couples can still use the individual words “husband” or “wife” when making their vows, though the gender-neutral “spouse” is also an option.

The move was criticised in a letter from the Church of England’s Secretary General William Nye which threatened to cut ties with the US church, if it introduces the new service as standard, replacing the current wording in its Book of Common Prayer.  Mr Nye urged the church to consider keeping the new service on “trial status” indefinitely to avoid “irrevocably redefining marriage”, adding that the new rites “constitute a clear divergence from the understanding of marriage held throughout the history of the Christian Church”.

Read more...

Presbyterian Church urges ‘No’ vote in abortion referendum

The Presbyterian Church in Ireland has called on its members to reject the referendum to repeal the Eighth Amendment and has branded the Government’s proposed legislation to replace it as “regressive, incompatible with human dignity and morally unacceptable”.
In a letter circulated this weekend to all Presbyterian clergy and congregations in the Republic, it said that: “The General Council of our Church, acting with the authority of the General Assembly, has concluded that meaningful protection for the unborn can only be secured if the Eighth Amendment is retained in the forthcoming referendum”. The letter is signed by the Church’s moderator Rt Rev Dr Noble McNeely, clerk of the general assembly Rev Trevor Gribben, and convener of the Republic of Ireland panel, council for public affairs, Very Rev Dr Trevor Morrow, also a former moderator of the church.
Regarding the abortion legislation the Government wishes to introduce after the referendum, they said that, “while recognising that there are mixed views within our church about the adequacy of the current Constitutional provision, particularly around those exceptional circumstances in which the termination of pregnancy may be necessary, we consider the proposals for unrestricted access to abortion up to 12 weeks of pregnancy to be regressive, incompatible with human dignity and morally unacceptable”.
Previously, the two Church of Ireland Archbishops – its Primate Archbishop Richard Clarke and Archbishop of Dublin Michael Jackson – indicated their opposition to simple repeal of the Eighth Amendment on account of the legislation that would follow it, as they are opposed to “unrestricted access to abortion in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, or indeed at any stage”.
Read more...

UK Supreme Court sit in Belfast for first time to hear Ashers Bakers’ appeal over ‘gay rights’ cake

The UK Supreme Court will sit in Belfast for the very first time this week to consider the appeal by Ashers Baking Company over its refusal – almost four years ago – to bake a cake bearing the campaign slogan ‘Support Gay Marriage’. The Christian-owned company has been dragged through the courts in Northern Ireland by the state-funded equality watchdog, the Equality Commission for Northern Ireland (ECNI), incurring as estimated £200,000 in legal bills.
Daniel McArthur, the General Manager of Ashers, said: “The hearing on May 1 will take place almost four years to the day from when we were approached to make a cake bearing a slogan totally contrary to our Christian beliefs. We politely said no and the order was fulfilled by another local bakery. Yet here we are four years later still defending the right not to be forced into someone else’s campaign”.
The family has been supported throughout by The Christian Institute and spokesman Simon Calvert said: “We believe the rulings in the lower courts undermine democratic freedom, religious freedom and free speech. It is not right to compel people to help make statements, whether in ink or in icing, with which they profoundly disagree. There are important principles at stake in this case which affect everyone. A truly tolerant society must allow for differences of belief.”
Read more...

Government adamant about keeping digital age of consent at 13

Raising the digital age of consent to 16 years will leave younger children at greater risk of online exploitation, the head of the Digital Youth Council has warned, as opposition parties are uniting in opposition to the Government’s proposal to set the age at the minimum possible, 13. Nonetheless, the Irish Times is reporting, Minister for Justice, Charlie Flanagan, will push ahead with plans to set the age at 13 even at the risk of being defeated in a Dáil vote.
Harry McCann, a member of the Government Data Forum, says TDs must focus on developing the digital education and literacy of parents and their children rather than banning young people from going online. “We felt the best way was not to ban or restrict access but to educate young people on safe and responsibly online use,” said the 19-year-old founder of the Digital Youth Forum, adding that younger children will continue to go online even if a ban is implemented.
“We spoke to various organisations, including the Ombudsman for Children, and they all agreed that education was better than a restriction.”
“Technology is part of our life, this issue is similar to sex education. We teach people how to have safe and responsible sex, we need to do the same with technology. It’s not a fad, it’s part of life.”
Various Children’s Rights Organisations support the digital age of consent being set at the lowest possible age including the Children’s Rights Alliance, the Ombudsman for Children and the Internet Safety Advisory Committee, all of whom agree with the age being set at 13.
Read more...

Save the 8th says YES vote will introduce abortion for healthy babies at six months

The Save the 8th campaign on Thursday morning unveiled a position paper outlining how the Government’s abortion bill introduces abortion for healthy babies at six months. The general scheme of the Govt’s proposed legislation states that it shall be lawful to carry out a termination of a pregnancy where there is risk of serious harm to the health of the pregnant woman. John McGuirk, communications director for the Save the 8th campaign, said 97 per cent of all abortions in the UK happen on mental health grounds. Niamh Uí Bhriain, chairwoman of Save the 8th, said “We’re going to make sure voters know that this is abortion on mental health grounds, the same model as the UK model of abortion right up to six months of a baby’s life. This will result in healthy babies being aborted right up to six months, that’s a very frightening prospect and a huge cultural change in this country”.

Read more...

New study shows sharp rise in tax burden on one income families

A new study shows that Ireland’s personal tax burden for one-income families not only rose in 2017, it recorded the largest increase anywhere, at 2.9 percentage points. In contrast, there were large decreases in Poland (5.1 percentage points) and Luxembourg (one percentage point).The survey also reveals the chasm that has opened up between families with children and single earners without.

Ireland is said to have a “fiscal preference” for families and this is highlighted by the report, published on Thursday. While it is on the rise, one-income families on the average wage and with children give up just 1.2 per cent of their income on tax. That is one of the lowest tax burdens in the OECD.  The 1.2 per cent net personal average tax rate for such families with children contrasts with a rate of 19.4 per cent for a single worker on the same wage. This is the third lowest of the 35 countries surveyed, alongside Canada, and behind only the Czech Republic (0.7 per cent) and Poland. The net personal tax rate is after taking into account transfers like Child Benefit.

Read more...

Save the 8th campaign calls on Dr Peter Boylan to resign

The Save the 8th campaign has called on Dr Peter Boylan to resign as chairman of the Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists following comments he made in an interview with Hot Press magazine. In the interview, Dr Boylan is quoted as saying: “Savita Halappanavar died as a result of the Eighth Amendment. Michelle Harte, who was looked after by Professor Louise Kenny, died as a consequence of the Eighth Amendment. Sheila Hodgers died as a consequence of the Eighth Amendment. We have the Miss P Case.” John McGuirk, communications director for the Save the 8th campaign, said the claim that four women had died due to the amendment was false and that more than 3,000 people had signed a petition calling for Dr Boylan to resign over the matter as of Thursday morning.

Read more...

Govt faces defeat in vote on digital consent–likely to be set at 16, rather than 13

The age at which children can consent to legal contracts with social media companies like Facebook without the consent of their parents looks set to be raised by three years to 16. Government Ministers had agreed to set the ‘digital age of consent’ at 13 but now face an embarrassing Dáil defeat unless they backtrack. Fianna Fáil, Sinn Féin and the Labour Party have all indicated they now favour raising the age limit to 16.

It comes as the messaging service WhatsApp announced that it has raised the minimum age for users in Europe to 16. The instant messaging app, which is owned by Facebook, said the move was in response to the EU’s General Data Protection Regulations (GDPR). GDPR bans the processing of personal information of children under 16 unless parents provide consent. However, individual countries can lower this to 13. Countries like France and germany decided to set it at the maximum age, 16, but the government and children’s rights organisations were intent on it being set at the minimum possible age in Ireland.

Justice Minister Charlie Flanagan has received Cabinet approval to set the age at 13. This position is backed by groups including the Irish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children and the Children’s Rights Alliance and the Special Rapporteur on Child Protection, Geoffrey Shannon.

However, the move by opposition parties toward the higher age limit could inflict an embarrassing Dáil defeat on the Government.

Read more...

LoveBoth challenges Minister Simon Harris to debate on abortion

The LoveBoth campaign has issued a challenge to Minister for Health, Simon Harris, to publicly defend his proposed draft legislation in a debate with one of their own representatives. At a press conference yesterday, a spokesperson said “Minister Simon Harris has challenged the pro-life movement on how we can justify the status quo and keeping the Eighth Amendment. In return, we challenge Minister Harris to a debate on his proposal and the issue in general, including alternatives to abortion”. They added: “Minister Harris wants to remove the right to life from the Constitution.  So our challenge to Minister Harris is: Come out and debate your abortion proposal with a LoveBoth spokesperson. There is nothing radical or progressive about taking away the right to life.”

Love Both claimed the proposed draft legislation will lead to one of the most extreme ‘abortion on demand’ regimes in the world.  Campaign spokeswoman Sinéad Slattery told a news conference on Wednesday: “The referendum is about one thing and one thing only – introducing abortion on demand.

The group were sharply critical of the political process for spending the last six years focussed exclusively on providing abortion, and nothing on providing alternatives to abortion.

Read more...