News Roundup

Most Fianna Fáil TDs and Senators will vote No to Repeal

Three times as many of the Fianna Fáil parliamentary party are campaigning for a No vote than a Yes vote in the forthcoming referendum on the Eighth Amendment. At least 35 Fianna Fáil TDs and Senators have coalesced into a group to campaign to save the pro-life amendment, including deputy leader Dara Calleary and the party’s finance spokesman Michael McGrath. The group is led by Fianna Fáil TD for Waterford Mary Butler. The group held a photocall yesterday with 31 members, including frontbench spokespersons Eamon Ó Cuív, Niamh Smyth, Anne Rabbitte and Margaret Murphy O’Mahony. Another four, TDs John McGuiness, Willie O’Dea, Kevin O’Keeffe and Senator Diarmuid Wilson, sent their apologies. Yesterday’s photocall was in response to a similar photo taken two weeks ago at the same venue attended by a mere 10 members calling for a Yes vote.

Read more...

Abortion as solution to mental health problems ‘naïve in the extreme’, says leading psychiatrist

Consultant psychiatrist Patricia Casey has said that to suggest abortion is a solution to mental illness “is naïve in the extreme”. Referring to 2010 study headed by Royal College of Psychiatrists in London, she said it found “whether a woman had an abortion for an unwanted pregnancy, or gave birth, made no difference to her mental health outcome”.
She said the General Schema of the Government’s proposed abortion legislation was “very vague in relation to psychiatric assessment”. It contained no definition of mental health and under its terms any medical practitioner could decide an abortion was necessary. “That, to me, is a gross deficiency in the Bill,” she said.
It could mean “a single doctor, specialty unspecified, can carry out an immediate termination of pregnancy where he or she is of the reasonable opinion that there is immediate risk of serious harm to the mental health of a woman, and it will be lawful to carry that out up until birth”, she said.
The Bill went “much farther than the politicians are pretending . It is extreme, it is unsupportable, and it is not based on any evidence,” she said.

Read more...

Pro-repeal groups criticised for avoiding all mention of abortion

Save the 8th spokesman John McGuirk has accused the pro-Repeal ‘Together for Yes’ campaign of desperately avoiding mention of abortion and the legislation that would follow upon repeal of the Eighth Amendment. “Posters up around the country saying yes for compassion, yes for care, yes for kittens, yes for puppies, not talking about the issue, not talking about the real facts, what’s in this Bill. They have a case to answer,” he said. “All they have been doing is engaging in platitudes. We think there is room for a real debate. That hasn’t happened yet and we hope that it will,” he said. The Government have already published the general schema of the abortion legislation it would introduce were the Eighth Amendment deleted from the constitution. The heads of the bill provide for unrestricted abortion for the first three months of pregnancy, abortion for serious threat to mental or physical health up to viability, around the sixth month of gestation, and abortion up to birth where the child has a life-limiting condition.

Read more...

Death of woman due to abortion not due to gross failure, says coroner

An inquest into a woman who travelled from Ireland to the UK for an abortion and subsequently died as a result of the procedure has not found her death to be due to negligence. The coroner, Dr Sean Cummings, identified an “element of complacency” within the west London clinic, but said he could not return a verdict of neglect as invited because he was not satisfied there had been a gross failure. He did criticise “repeated failures” at the Marie Stopes abortion clinic and said the case was “desperately sad”.
“Her death resulted from the manifestation of a recognised complication of the procedure resulting in sometimes subtle and atypical symptoms and signs which were not appreciated as potentially sinister at the time”.
Ms Chithira died in January 2012 following a late-stage abortion. Ms Chithira suffered a tear to her uterus during the “blind” procedure performed under anaesthetic, as a surgeon struggled to remove the dismembered parts of a 22-week-old foetus from her womb. Afterwards she vomited and complained of feeling unwell to her husband, but was helped into a taxi to a cousin’s home in Slough by staff who had told her she could not stay overnight. Later that night the mother suffered catastrophic internal bleeding of around two litres and died. Dr Adedayo Adedeji, who performed the procedure, and nurses Gemma Pullen and Margaret Miller were charged with manslaughter by gross negligence and a health and safety breach but the case was dropped in 2016.

Read more...

Harris engaged in campaign of misinformation about his own bill, says Save the 8th campaign

The minister for health is engaged in a campaign of misinformation about his own proposed abortion legislation, Save the 8th has said today. The organisation challenged the Minister to debate the heads of the bill, which have already been published, rather than “name calling through a press officer”. The organisation pointed to several inconsistencies between the heads of the bill, and Minister Harris’s own public statements about the bill.

A spokesperson for Save The 8th said that Minister Harris has said that “late term abortions will be illegal”. However, the spokesperson said there is no such prohibition on late term abortions in the heads of bill published by the Government. He continued: “Minister Harris has said that in cases where the foetus can survive outside the womb, the baby will be delivered. However, no such provision exists in his bill. Indeed, ‘termination of pregnancy’ is defined in his bill as: ‘termination of pregnancy means a medical procedure which is intended to end the life of the foetus'”.

Most prominently, according to Savethe8th, Minister Harris said in a statement last week that it was a “big lie” to say abortions would be legal at six months. “This is patently and obviously untrue. The heads of the bill allow an abortion until viability where there is a risk of serious harm to the mental health of the mother, where ‘serious harm’ is undefined in the bill”, said the spokesperson.

Read more...

Same-sex marriage supporters rise to defend Ashers Bakery in ‘compelled speech’ case

Family-run Ashers Baking Company should not be forced to promote a cause which its owners profoundly disagree with, a columnist says. Writing in the Belfast Telegraph, Fionola Meredith said Ashers’ situation was “not a case of anti-gay discrimination” because the row is over a message – not an individual. Meredith explained that she supports same-sex marriage but disagrees with earlier court rulings against the Christian bakers viewing it as an issue of compelled speech rather than gay rights. “No company should be under any obligation to facilitate the dissemination of beliefs that are antithetical to the ethos of that business. . . . The message itself – not the customer requesting it – has always been the issue for Ashers.”

The columnist described the long-running legal case brought by the Equality Commission for Northern Ireland as “costly, vexatious and divisive”. She said it was not equality to force everyone to “disseminate political beliefs that they fundamentally disagree with”.

“It is not tolerance. It is not freedom. If Ashers lose this week, we all lose”.

Read more...

Church of England split over US plan to remove ‘husband and wife’ from marriage service

The Anglican communion is sharply divided over plans by The Episcopal Church (TEC) in the US to change its marriage service to a gay-friendly version which would remove “husband and wife” and “procreation” from the marriage service.

The new service removes the phrase “the union of husband and wife” and replaces it with “the union of two people”, and replaces the section which talks about part of God’s intention for marriage being “for the procreation of children” with the phrase “for the gift of children” to make it more relevant for same-sex couples who may wish to adopt. Couples can still use the individual words “husband” or “wife” when making their vows, though the gender-neutral “spouse” is also an option.

The move was criticised in a letter from the Church of England’s Secretary General William Nye which threatened to cut ties with the US church, if it introduces the new service as standard, replacing the current wording in its Book of Common Prayer.  Mr Nye urged the church to consider keeping the new service on “trial status” indefinitely to avoid “irrevocably redefining marriage”, adding that the new rites “constitute a clear divergence from the understanding of marriage held throughout the history of the Christian Church”.

Read more...

Presbyterian Church urges ‘No’ vote in abortion referendum

The Presbyterian Church in Ireland has called on its members to reject the referendum to repeal the Eighth Amendment and has branded the Government’s proposed legislation to replace it as “regressive, incompatible with human dignity and morally unacceptable”.
In a letter circulated this weekend to all Presbyterian clergy and congregations in the Republic, it said that: “The General Council of our Church, acting with the authority of the General Assembly, has concluded that meaningful protection for the unborn can only be secured if the Eighth Amendment is retained in the forthcoming referendum”. The letter is signed by the Church’s moderator Rt Rev Dr Noble McNeely, clerk of the general assembly Rev Trevor Gribben, and convener of the Republic of Ireland panel, council for public affairs, Very Rev Dr Trevor Morrow, also a former moderator of the church.
Regarding the abortion legislation the Government wishes to introduce after the referendum, they said that, “while recognising that there are mixed views within our church about the adequacy of the current Constitutional provision, particularly around those exceptional circumstances in which the termination of pregnancy may be necessary, we consider the proposals for unrestricted access to abortion up to 12 weeks of pregnancy to be regressive, incompatible with human dignity and morally unacceptable”.
Previously, the two Church of Ireland Archbishops – its Primate Archbishop Richard Clarke and Archbishop of Dublin Michael Jackson – indicated their opposition to simple repeal of the Eighth Amendment on account of the legislation that would follow it, as they are opposed to “unrestricted access to abortion in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, or indeed at any stage”.
Read more...

UK Supreme Court sit in Belfast for first time to hear Ashers Bakers’ appeal over ‘gay rights’ cake

The UK Supreme Court will sit in Belfast for the very first time this week to consider the appeal by Ashers Baking Company over its refusal – almost four years ago – to bake a cake bearing the campaign slogan ‘Support Gay Marriage’. The Christian-owned company has been dragged through the courts in Northern Ireland by the state-funded equality watchdog, the Equality Commission for Northern Ireland (ECNI), incurring as estimated £200,000 in legal bills.
Daniel McArthur, the General Manager of Ashers, said: “The hearing on May 1 will take place almost four years to the day from when we were approached to make a cake bearing a slogan totally contrary to our Christian beliefs. We politely said no and the order was fulfilled by another local bakery. Yet here we are four years later still defending the right not to be forced into someone else’s campaign”.
The family has been supported throughout by The Christian Institute and spokesman Simon Calvert said: “We believe the rulings in the lower courts undermine democratic freedom, religious freedom and free speech. It is not right to compel people to help make statements, whether in ink or in icing, with which they profoundly disagree. There are important principles at stake in this case which affect everyone. A truly tolerant society must allow for differences of belief.”
Read more...

Government adamant about keeping digital age of consent at 13

Raising the digital age of consent to 16 years will leave younger children at greater risk of online exploitation, the head of the Digital Youth Council has warned, as opposition parties are uniting in opposition to the Government’s proposal to set the age at the minimum possible, 13. Nonetheless, the Irish Times is reporting, Minister for Justice, Charlie Flanagan, will push ahead with plans to set the age at 13 even at the risk of being defeated in a Dáil vote.
Harry McCann, a member of the Government Data Forum, says TDs must focus on developing the digital education and literacy of parents and their children rather than banning young people from going online. “We felt the best way was not to ban or restrict access but to educate young people on safe and responsibly online use,” said the 19-year-old founder of the Digital Youth Forum, adding that younger children will continue to go online even if a ban is implemented.
“We spoke to various organisations, including the Ombudsman for Children, and they all agreed that education was better than a restriction.”
“Technology is part of our life, this issue is similar to sex education. We teach people how to have safe and responsible sex, we need to do the same with technology. It’s not a fad, it’s part of life.”
Various Children’s Rights Organisations support the digital age of consent being set at the lowest possible age including the Children’s Rights Alliance, the Ombudsman for Children and the Internet Safety Advisory Committee, all of whom agree with the age being set at 13.
Read more...