Two years after the Children and Family Relationships Act was passed, a register of donors to enable donor-conceived children identify their genetic parents has still not been set up. A request by the Irish Times to the Department of Health for a briefing elicited a one-line response saying that parts 2 and 3 of the Act will be commenced later this year. Meanwhile, Dr John Waterstone, medical director of the Waterstone Clinic in Cork and president of the Irish Fertility Society, described the Act’s proposal for a register as overly coercive and unconstitutional, and vowed to challenge it legally if it is introduced.
In comments to the Irish Times, he said the proposal to create a register is a fad. He would allow donor-conceived children being provided with medical and other information through their parents, so long as it is nonidentifying. “I’d hate to find that, if I had donated sperm, a 21-year-old son would come knocking on the door, saying, ‘Hello, Dad’. That’s when it can get messy.” He asks whether it is fair on a couple who, unable to have a baby, embark on the donor-conceived option, and “then spend all those years changing nappies and waiting outside the teen discos”, to have a third person, the donor, “intrude” in their lives.
In Dr Waterstone’s view a child is not “hard done by” by not knowing the full detail of his or her genetic heritage. The idea that donor-conceived children are entitled to know their identity is, he said, “utterly meaningless”. This is despite the fact that thousands of donor-conceived children seek out their biological parenrs in later life.