Dismissing the two upcoming Constitutional referendums as mere “ideological gesturing”, the former Justice Minister, Michael McDowell, has called for a ‘No’ vote in both of them on March 8, polling day.
Writing in the Irish Times, Senator McDowell said the existing article on mothers in no way diminishes choice for them, but casts an obligation on the State to amplify their free choices “by assisting those who freely choose to work in the home and would otherwise be forced against their wishes to engage in labour outside the home”.
As for the family referendum, he said the term “durable relationships” is not defined and will be decided by the courts, but they have already said “durable” means capable of lasting but is not the same as “enduring” or permanent.
He asks if the term is intended for polyamorous relations, extending beyond the household, and are such relationships then to constitute the “natural, primary and fundamental unit groups of society”?
He said the fact that a Citizens’ Assembly recommended change “does not justify us in engaging in a process of constitutional amendment by blindman’s-buff referendums”.
“Apart from ideological gesturing, these amendments appear to serve no positive purpose. Far from being retrograde, it would be entirely prudent to vote No”.