News Roundup

Faith leaders condemn China’s brutal repression of Uighur minority

Two Catholic Cardinals and a former archbishop of Canterbury are among more than 70 faith leaders publicly declaring that the Uighurs are facing “one of the most egregious human tragedies since the Holocaust”, and that those responsible for the persecution of the Chinese Muslim minority must be held accountable.

The incarceration of at least a million Uighurs and other Muslims in prison camps, where they are reported to face starvation, torture, murder, sexual violence, slave labour and forced organ extraction, is a potential genocide, say the clerics.

The statement, signed by five serving Church of England bishops, the Coptic archbishop of London, the Dalai Lama’s representative in Europe, plus cardinals, imams and rabbis, says the plight of the Uighurs “calls into question most seriously the willingness of the international community to defend universal human rights for everyone”.

It adds: “The clear aim of the Chinese authorities is to eradicate the Uighur identity. China’s state media has stated that the goal is to ‘break their lineage, break their roots, break their connections and break their origins’ … High-level Chinese government documents speak of ‘absolutely no mercy’. Parliamentarians, governments and jurists have a responsibility to investigate.”

The faith leaders say: “After the Holocaust, the world said ‘Never Again’. Today, we repeat those words ‘Never Again’, all over again…. We make a simple call for justice, to investigate these crimes, hold those responsible to account and establish a path towards the restoration of human dignity.”

Their statement comes after comparisons were made last month between the Holocaust and atrocities against the Uighurs in a letter from the president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, Marie van der Zyl, to the Chinese ambassador in Britain.

Read more...

‘Deeply flawed’: pro-life groups react to Kamala Harris pick

Pro-life voices in the US have criticised the selection of Sen. Kamala Harris as former vice president Joe Biden’s running mate for the 2020 election.

Fordham University professor Charles Camosy, who left the Democratic Party earlier this year over the party’s stance on abortion, said that for Catholics “in favor of prenatal justice, and of government defending these children from terrible violence, we must say that Harris is a deeply flawed candidate”.

“Unreserved praise of her VP candidacy is, in effect, yet another example of erasure of the prenatal child,” Camosy said on Twitter.

Democrats for Life of America said in a statement that she “does not provide pro-life Democrats with any assurances and will, in fact, further alienate 21 million Democratic voters who have been left out of the party for quite some time.”

Michael Sean Winters, a writer for the National Catholic Reporter, was critical of Harris’ 2018 questioning of a judicial nominee over his membership of the Knights of Columbus, calling her treatment of Brian C. Buescher “embarrassing in both its ignorance and its bigotry.”

National Review writer Alexandra DeSanctis made a similar observation, saying Harris’s time on the Senate judiciary committee had shown “reprehensible anti-Catholic bigotry, and there’s no reason to believe her views have changed.”

Several commentators from across the political divide also noted Harris’ noted support for unlimited access to abortion.

Read more...

Belgian doctors support infanticide for babies with serious disabilities

A Belgian study has shown overwhelming support among doctors surveyed for infanticide when a newborn baby has a serious disability.

Medical personnel involved in abortion decision‐making at eight Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Flanders were surveyed for the research.

Almost nine out of ten respondents (89.1%) agree that “in the event of a serious (non‐lethal) neonatal condition, administering drugs with the explicit intention to end neonatal life is acceptable”.

Additionally, the research showed that “Behavioural intentions indicate that even in situations with an unclear diagnosis and unpredictable prognosis, 85.6% of professionals would still consider late TOP [termination of pregnancy]”.

Catherine Robinson of Right to Life UK called the findings “profoundly disturbing”.

“Less than ten years ago, there was a strong condemnation of the idea of ending a baby’s life after it had been born, regardless of whether or not it had a disability, when this idea was floated by academics in the British Medical Journal.

Tragically, she added, “it now appears to have gone from an outlandish academic thought experiment to be seen as something that is morally acceptable”.

“It is profoundly disturbing that these healthcare professionals, who should be upholding the right to life and giving every baby the best possible chance at life, are hugely in favour of ‘after-birth abortions’ and infanticide of babies with a disability.”

Read more...

OPW to help Cork nuns after orchard robbed

The Office of Public Works has agreed to provide assistance to an enclosed order of nuns in Co Cork, after ten wheelbarrows full of apples from their orchard were stolen on Friday night. The orchard is an important source of income for the convent.

The nuns at St Benedict’s Priory in Cobh say the apples from the Bible Garden are a vital source of income for the upkeep of their convent.

The apples are used to make chutneys, which are sold at the convent’s Oasis Tea Room.

The Prioress of the Mount, Mother Catherine, said she and her fellow nuns are distraught following the theft.

Speaking on RTÉ’s Drivetime, Fianna Fáil TD for Cork East, James O’Connor, said he has spoken to gardaí about the theft.

“Our understanding is that a number of other gardens in the area have experienced similar incidents over the weekend,” he said.

The Office of Public Works has agreed to “step in and provide assistance” to the nuns by replacing the stolen fruit with apples from a nearby orchard on an OPW-owned site at Barryscourt Castle in Carrigtwohill.

This assistance will help plug the funding gap for the nuns, he said.

Read more...

Knock to close for Feast of the Assumption over Covid fears

Knock Shrine will not open its grounds on what would normally be its busiest day of the year due to fears about the spread of Covid-19.

In a statement the rector of Knock Shrine, Fr Richard Gibbons, said the Co Mayo venue will not open for the Feast of the Assumption on 15 August due to the escalation of the virus around the country.

Fr Gibbons said during discussions with Church and State bodies it was decided the shrine did not have the resources to deal with the large numbers of people expected.

He said: “As the National Marian Shrine, we have been extra vigilant in living up to our responsibilities amid this pandemic in placing people’s physical and spiritual well-being to the fore.

“I would ask for your understanding and patience at this time.”

The Feast of the Assumption attracts over 20,000 people to Knock every year.

The shrine and its grounds will be closed from 8pm on Friday 14 August to 7am on Sunday 16 August.

Masses will be celebrated online only and behind closed doors at 12pm, 3pm and 7.30pm.

Read more...

Pro-birth policies ‘mark of authoritarian regimes’

A leading academic has associated pro-natal policies with authoritarian and totalitarian regimes.

Writing on the RTE website, Prof Mary P Corcoran, acknowledges that there is a looming birth crisis both in Ireland and around the world so that countries will no longer replace themselves, and a diminishing number of young people will have to take care of an ever growing elderly population.

After briefly considering immigration as a solution, the Professor of Sociology at Maynooth University then turns to policies that foster the birth rate. Calling it a “more controversial solution”, she says: “History teaches us that pro-natalist policies often have the effect of weaponising childbearing for political ends”. She then name checks Stalin’s Soviet Union, Hitler’s Nazi Germany, and Ceausescu’s Romania as examples.

As contemporary examples, she offers Turkey and Hungary.

She concludes: “we know from history, that pro-natalist policies, especially those aggressively policed by the state, rarely produce the desired impact. Rather, their unintended consequences produce both a deterioration in the health of women and a diminution in their reproductive rights.
She offered no solution to low birth rates.
Non-authoritarian countries such as France also have a variety of pro-natal policies.
Read more...

HSE spent €2.9 million on ’early-term,’ abortions in 2019

The HSE spent €2.9 million providing abortions through GPs in 2019.

This refers only to abortions that took place in the first nine weeks of pregnancy, using drugs prescribed and dispensed by a GP, and does not include surgical abortions which occur only in hospital settings and cater for pregnancies beyond nine weeks.

The figure was confirmed by Geraldine Crowley, Assistant National Director, Primary Care Strategy and Planning in response to a parliamentary question from Carol Nolan TD.

Commenting on the News, Deputy Nolan called the figure “staggering”, especially considering that “an almost equal amount of funding (€3.1million) was allocated for the implementation of the entire National Women and Infants Health Programme (NWIHP) in 2019”.

She continued: “When you put this information, and the recent annual report on the number of abortions that took place in 2019 together, what we now have is an emerging sense of how much abortion is going to ‘cost’ in terms of the loss of human life and the financial resources that could be better spent at the community level”.

“It is also clear however that the fees of €2.9 million do not represent anything like the true financial cost because that number only refers to abortions which took place at 9 weeks or under in a community setting. It takes no account of the costs associated with the delivery of abortion ‘services’ beyond 9 weeks and which have to take place in our maternity hospitals.”

Read more...

US Christians overwhelmingly back coronavirus restrictions

A new Pew Research Center survey finds that U.S. adults overwhelmingly say houses of worship should be required to follow the same rules about social distancing and large gatherings as other organizations or businesses in their local area. About eight-in-ten Americans (79%) take this position, four times the share (19%) who think houses of worship should be allowed more flexibility than other kinds of establishments.

This view was shared by the vast majority of believers, with three-quarters of US Christians saying churches should be subject to the same rules as other businesses.

In addition, many Americans who regularly attend religious services express support for instituting a variety of restrictions and modifications at their own places of worship. At the time the survey was conducted (July 13 to 19), only 13% said their house of worship should be open to the public just as it was before the outbreak.

Read more...

Euthanasia campaigners engaged in ‘scaremongering’, says doctor

There is a degree of scaremongering being engaged in by advocates of euthanasia, according to a leading geriatric specialist.

Speaking on RTE Radio 1 Thursday, Des O’Neill, Professor of Geriatric Medicine at Tallaght Hospital, said there are major studies that show the vast majority of people die in a dignified way, with appropriate care and support.

He told Sarah McInerney that people in the caring professions are becoming increasingly concerned by the “inappropriate and inaccurate simplifications” of those advocating for what they euphemistically term “death with dignity”.

He said that the introduction of euthanasia and assisted-suicide in places like the Netherlands really undercuts “positive, promoting, caring, supportive ethics”, and he cited the recent case of a patient suffering with dementia who had to be restrained while receiving a lethal injection.

Professor O’Neil was responding to former Junior Minister, John Halligan, whose 2015 euthanasia bill is being revived in the current Oireachtas by socialist TD, Gino Kenny.

Read more...

Possible referendum to allow adopted children discover their natal identity

The possibility of a referendum to give adopted children access to their birth records has been raised.

Briefing documents drawn up for Minister for Children Roderic O’Gorman reveal newly emerging cases of illegal birth registrations.

They also signal a referendum may be needed to give adopted people access to information on their birth.

Recent attempts have failed to balance the competing rights of privacy and information to allow full access to records be granted.

In 2018 it emerged that 126 births between 1946 and 1969 had been deliberately and falsely registered, with the names of the adoptive parents incorrectly recorded as the birth parents. That figure has now risen to 151.

“It is understood that there is a high likelihood that a number of High Court proceedings will be taken by individuals affected by illegal registration, and a number of cases have now been instigated,” the note says.

“The impact of being informed that they were the subject of an illegal birth registration has had a considerable impact on many individuals’ wellbeing, and the State’s duty of care should be considered in relation to any future cases. In particular, in some cases, individuals have been informed that they were the subject of an illegal birth registration, but as their birth mother does not consent to the release of her information, they can be told no more.”

Read more...