News Roundup

Canadian PM Trudeau tells Varadkar: abortion should be a ‘human right’

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has told his Irish counterpart that abortion in Ireland should be a “human right”. Mr Vardakar had briefed Mr Trudeau on his plans to hold a referendum to repeal the Eighth amendment which, he said, “I know is an important issue for a lot of campaigners for women’s rights in Canada”.
Asked whether he had any advice for the Taoiseach, Mr Trudeau said, “On the issue of reproductive rights, I shared our perspective that reproductive rights for women are integral to women’s rights in general and women’s rights are human rights and I encouraged him to look at it as a question of fundamental rights for women and we had a good discussion on that”.
Canada has one of the laxest abortion regimes in the world, with women able to terminate their pregnancies at any stage up to birth. Yet it has been suggested by Repeal the Eighth campaigners as a model of abortion law that Ireland might adopt should it delete its constitutional protection for the unborn.
Criticsm of Mr Trudeau’s intervention, and Mr Varadkar’s failure to challenge the Canadians on their own abortion record came quick and fast. Popular Jesuit priest, Father James Martin, commented, “So much for the human rights of the child”, in a tweet that was shared over 250 times and received almost a thousand likes. Ruth Cullen of the Pro-Life Campaign asked “If Prime Minister Trudeau was so anxious to challenge Ireland’s pro-life constitution, why did the Taoiseach in turn remain silent about Canada’s ‘truly barbaric’ abortion law?” Freelance journalist and broadcaster, Wendy Grace asked of Mr Varadkar, “Why wasn’t he the one challenging Trudeau about abortion? Where was his outrage about what Canada does to pre-born children who are not wanted? What about the 491 Canadian children from 2000 to 2009 who survived botched abortion procedures and so were ignored by hospital staff and simply left to die?” Regarding Ireland’s pro-life constitution, she added “Where was his defence of Ireland’s law, of how the Irish people and not some parliamentary elite voted in 1983 to protect both unborn children and their mothers?”
Read more...

Church seeking to promote the ‘ideal of family’ at World Meeting of Families, says Archbishop Diarmuid Martin

Archbishop Diarmuid Martin has said that while “there is no such thing as the ideal family”, nonetheless “there is an ideal of family,” which is what the Church is seeking to promote through the international gathering of families due to take place in Dublin in August 2018. He was speaking at the launch of the World Meeting of Families in Knock on Monday as families from across Ireland met at the shrine to celebrate the one-year countdown to next year’s event which Pope Francis is expected to attend. The 2018 gathering’s icon of the Holy Family was unveiled and anointed at the Mass and will begin a journey through the 26 Catholic dioceses in Ireland. Archbishop of Dublin Diarmuid Martin presided at the basilica’s 3pm Mass where he preached on the theme “When Plates Fly: Pope Francis on the joys and challenges of family life”. There was no family “that is ideal”, he said. “Plates fly in every family. There are, however, great families who struggle, at times heroically. The celebration of a World Meeting of Families would be hypocritical were it to be a celebration that ignored this struggle,” the Archbishop said. “A civilization of love must involve the search for a new politics for families, a politics of care for the marginalised and those who struggle. Where human love fails or is imperfect, our response should not just be that of condemnation or exclusion, but one of allowing the medicine of mercy to lead people towards a more perfect love,” he said.

Read more...

UK Supreme Court to hear heterosexual couple’s challenge to civil partnership ban

A heterosexual couple who want to enter a civil partnership instead of getting married have been granted the right to take their case to the UK Supreme Court. The couple are currently prevented from doing so by the Civil Partnership Act 2004, which only applies to same-sex couples, and they argue the State’s position is “incompatible with equality law”.

The couple say that not all families are comfortable with marriage, but want the “financial and legal protection” that a civil partnership provides. The Equal Civil Partnerships Campaign argues marriage comes with religious connotations and notions of patriarchy. Rebecca Steinfeld, who is bringing the case with her partner, Charles Keidan, said: “We hope the Supreme Court will deliver a judgment that will finally provide access to civil partnerships for thousands of families across the country.” Theirs solicitor Louise Whitfield said: “This is a very significant achievement for my clients as the Supreme Court only gives permission for a very small number of cases each year – those that are the most important for the court to consider.”

Read more...

DUP says health, education, economy suffering due to Sinn Fein intransigence on same-sex marriage

Sinn Fein ‘intransigence’ is preventing Northern Ireland politicians from dealing with growing problems in health, education and the economy, the Democratic Unionists have claimed. The DUP were responding to criticism levelled by Sinn Fein that they are the ones halting the formation of a powersharing administration. Senior DUP member Simon Hamilton said the executive should be formed immediately, with a parallel process instigated to deal with the outstanding issues such as the Irish language and the ban on same sex marriage.

He told BBC Radio Ulster: “The DUP would go up to Stormont this morning and form a government and deal with those difficult issues that there are around health, around education and the economy which we believe are more important than the issues which Sin Fein are stalling the restoration of an executive on. They are the only party that are blocking the restoration of an executive to deal with those difficult issues and there are many who are coming to the conclusion that Sinn Fein do not actually want to go back into government, that they are not serious about restoring devolution.”

Read more...

Chilean Bishops criticise lifting of ban on abortion

The Bishops of Chile have sharply criticised a Supreme Court ruling that a bill that ended Chile’s ban on abortion is constitutional. The judgement paves the way for abortion to be legalised if the baby is conceived in rape, if the mother’s life is at risk, or if the baby is not expected to survive the pregnancy.

In their message, the bishops said the resolution adopted “offends the conscience and the common good of the citizens.” They add that society as a whole loses with the legalisation of abortion in Chile, even if it’s only under certain conditions: “We are confronted with a new situation in which some unborn human beings are left unprotected by the State in this basic and fundamental right.”

The note, signed by the heads of the Chilean bishops’ conference, also says that from this point on, “our option for life is translated in redoubling our effort to continue accompanying women who live with their pregnancies in extreme situations, those who choose to see it to term, and those who think abortion is a solution.”

Read more...

Court hears woman ‘forced into abortion’ by abusive husband

A woman who became pregnant after marrying an Irish man was forced by her “violent and abusive” husband to have the baby aborted in a Manchester clinic, the High Court was told on Friday. The woman is originally from Africa and is under threat of deportation now that her marriage to the Irish man has been dissolved. The court was told the man was particularly abusive after the woman became pregnant. He put extreme pressure on her to terminate the pregnancy. “He had arranged everything from the flight ticket to the clinic procedure because I wanted to keep my baby and had categorically refused to have an abortion,” the woman said in a sworn statement. The woman said her husband continued to be hostile about it and threatened to end their relationship and have her immigration status cancelled. Her father in law was also abusive to her and often called her “a black bitch.” The court was told that following the woman’s abortion her mental health suffered and the marriage was dissolved. She returned to her home country to recover with the help of her family and came back to Ireland later through Northern Ireland.
Read more...

Canadian PM urged to lobby Varadkar for Ireland ‘to be seen as the modern country that it is’ on abortion

A Canadian pro-abortion group has called on the Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, to lobby his Irish counterpart, Leo Varadkar, during an official visit by the Taoiseach to Canada. “With the Irish Prime Minister coming to Canada, there is a really great opportunity to talk about women’s rights, reproductive rights and access to abortion,” said Meghan Doherty, global policy and advocacy officer at Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights. “The [Canadian] Prime Minister’s stance … could be quite persuasive with the Irish government to encourage them to be progressive, to respect women’s rights and to be seen as the modern country that it is.”
The Pro Life Campaign in Ireland responded by shining a light on Canada’s own abortion record which it described as barbaric and grotesque. Spokesperson Dr Ruth Cullen said she was surprised that abortion campaigners are using the Taoiseach’s trip to Canada to try and drum up support for abortion in Ireland “given Canada’s particularly grotesque abortion laws”.
“Canada in effect provides no legal protection for unborn babies throughout the entire nine months of pregnancy”. She continued: “Official Canadian figures show that over a ten year period starting in 2000, 491 babies who survived botched abortions were abandoned by medical staff and left to die alone in the corners of hospitals. These figures reveal the chilling and truly barbaric reality of legalised abortion. It’s a bit much the way Ireland’s pro-life laws are constantly attacked with little or no criticism or debate on what happens in other countries. Implied in the criticism of Ireland is that countries like Canada offer an example to the world when it comes to abortion legislation. An incredible 1 in 5 pregnancies in Canada end in abortion and there is no legal protection for unborn babies, right up to birth. “If an issue is going to be made of Ireland’s abortion laws in the coming days, then the inconvenient truth about Canada’s abortion law must also be front and centre of any discussion.”
 
Read more...

Court refuses to overturn Northern Ireland’s laws on marriage

The High Court in Belfast yesterday refused to make same-sex marriage legal in the jurisdiction.  Mr Justice O’Hara said: “It’s not the role of a judge to decide social policy, that is for the Executive and the Assembly under our Constitution.”  Two gay couples took the case and argued that the refusal to legislate for same-sex marriage breaches their entitlement to family life and marriage under the European Convention on Human Rights. In the proceedings, Northern Ireland was described as “a blot on the map” seen by the rest of the world as backward-looking and divided. The judge however said the challenge was going against all recent European case law. “Put simply, the Strasbourg court has not recognised any right to same-sex marriage,” said Mr Justice O’Hara. In a separate case, the judge also ruled there was no discrimination in the North’s refusal to recognise same-sex marriages from elsewhere in the UK, treating them instead as civil partnerships. He said: “The Strasbourg court has held that same-sex marriage is not even a (European) Convention right. While it’s open to government and parliament to provide for it, they are not obliged to do so and whether they do so is a matter for them, not the courts.” He added: “The judgment I have to reach is not based on social policy, but on the law.”

Read more...

Staff at Australian broadcaster receive ‘trauma toolkit’ to deal with distress from same-sex marriage debate

ABC, the Australian version of the BBC, has offered staff a counselling hotline and “trauma toolkit” to help distressed employees during the country’s upcoming same-sex marriage postal plebiscitein November. Managers have been provided with strict guidelines on how to spot a staff member who is suffering from trauma, including what is called ‘vicarious trauma’: “The potential for vicarious trauma (also known as secondary trauma, compassion fatigue and burnout) is high when we feel ­connected to events occurring,” the document said. “Vicarious traumatisation means that we connect with the vulnerability of the situation and may be emotionally engaged with the story or event because of this.” Those affected by a potentially traumatic event (PTE) are enocuraged to seek help: “Over 65 Peer Support Leaders are available across the ABC and provide a listening ear to anyone who needs to discuss a PTE”.

Some politicians have sharply criticised the move. “I want to know where the Christian helpline is, particularly after the ABC themselves broadcast outrageous slurs against those who go to church, incorrectly claiming they were more likely to engage in domestic violence,” Senator Matthew Canavan told The Australian yesterday. “They have no authority in these debates to be taking the moral high ground when they have been some of the worst perpetrators of prejudice and bigotry in the last few months.” Liberal senator Eric Abetz said it showed the “gross and deliberate bias” of the taxpayer-funded broad­caster, “highlighted by the clear assumption that only one side of the debate might be dealt with inappropriately”.

“There is no offer of counselling and assistance for those that might be vilified and attacked for holding a view opposed to the ABC’s groupthink in favour of changing the definition of marriage,” Senator Abetz said.

Read more...

As protestant bigotry fades, a new ‘progressive’ bigotry rises, says Scottish Archbishop

The Archbishop of Glasgow, Philip Tartaglia, has said that although old-fashioned Protestant bigotry may have faded, more “sophisticated” forms of discrimination have taken its place. Speaking to a convocation of priests in Philadelphia, he said: “Atheists and secularists in the 1960s and 1970s were content to ignore or mock the Catholic Church, but today many see her as the single most formidable threat to their notions of justice and equality, particularly when it comes to matters of human sexuality. If the Church dissents from today’s new rulebook for the human person – and she must – then she should expect rough treatment.”

He said the hostility came from a “new ‘religious’ consensus” formed from a “combination of scepticism, consumer appetite and political intolerance”. “It masks itself with progressive vocabulary, but its targets tend to be practising Christians.”

Read more...