Courts should be obliged to consider “reasonable accommodation” in equality cases to benefit both sides where rights clash, the Christian Institute has argued. During a public debate, the institute’s Deputy Director for Public Affairs, Simon Calvert, said such an insertion in equality law would have resulted in a fairer outcome for the Ashers Bakery case. The Christian Institute has supported the owners of Ashers throughout their legal battle in the case involving refusal to fulfil an order for a cake bearing a message supportive of same-sex marriage. In the “tiny minority of cases where there is a clash of rights”, Mr Calvert argued, courts should be “obliged to go through a careful process of assessing and balancing the competing rights, to see whether reasonable accommodation can be made for both sides…If equality law is causing injustice and misery. If it’s taking away freedom of speech and freedom of religion and freedom of conscience, then it should be changed.”