The time set aside for the teaching of religion in Irish schools may become ‘discretionary’ under new proposals to be published next month. The proposals, contained in a National Council for Curriculum and Assessment report on primary school education look set to recommend that a planned religion, beliefs and ethics class be incorporated into the wider core curriculum as opposed to becoming a separate class. Thus areas of religion could, for example, be covered in a geography class. The resultant overlap with areas such as faith formation means that a school could have the flexibility to decide how much time to devote to this. While the Education Act (1998) protects the right of schools to set aside reasonable time in each school day for subjects relating to the school’s ethos, it does not specify how much time should be set aside for this subject, allowing for flexibility on the part of schools.
Britain’s Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has criticised organisations which seek to remove references to Christianity or discipline Christians arising from cases of deeply held beliefs. In a new report, the EHRC criticises UK cinemas for banning a Church of England prayer advert and laments the decision by British Airways for suspending a staff member who refused to remove a cross she wears. One section of the report states: “There is no right in Britain not to be offended and, in our view, respect for people’s right to express beliefs with which others might disagree, is the mark of a democratic society.” Chief of the EHRC, David Isaac, also hit out at public bodies which relabel their Christmas celebrations with secular terms such as ‘Winterval’, for fear of giving offence.
Catholic bishops and other religious educators have stated that the Government’s draft proposal to teach world faiths in schools is “unworkable”. In responses offered to the National Council for Curriculum and Assessment’s (NCCA) invitation for submissions on the world religions proposal, Bishop Alphonsus Cullinan of Waterford and Lismore said, “In its current form, [the curriculum] would be impossible to implement in Catholic schools under my patronage.” Bishop Denis Nulty, meanwhile, said the curriculum represents a threat to Catholic school ethos. In separate submissions, both the Catholic Primary School Management Association and the Association of Trustees of Catholic Schools echoed the bishops’ concerns, describing the curriculum as flawed and potentially unconstitutional. “We cannot recommend to the parents of children in our schools that they would support this planned programme and as representatives of the trustees of the said schools we have no choice but to reasonably object to same,” the Association said.
British former MP Ann Widdecombe has warned that Christians there face increased persecution. Commenting in the wake of the Ashers Bakery ruling, which she described as “something of a nonsense”, Ms Widdecombe pointed out that, historically, being forced to affirm beliefs contrary to conscience is “rightly recognised as the hallmark of totalitarianism itself” and said that the Ashers outcome had been a failure to uphold freedom of conscience. She added that gay rights legislation, and a refusal to allow dissent from it, has led to the closure of adoption agencies, and obstacles being put in the way of Christians becoming B&B owners, adoptive or foster parents, and even bakers. Ms Widdecombe went on to call on people of faith to not “sleepwalk through this” at the risk of seeing more of their liberties removed.
The family at the heart of the Ashers Bakery case for discrimination over their refusal to bake a cake bearing a pro-gay marriage slogan, may be set to have their appeal heard at the UK Supreme Court after a Belfast judge ruled that provisions in the Northern Ireland Act 1998 could provide a route to that court. During a fresh appeal hearing against the discrimination finding levelled against the McArthur family, prompted by the NI Attorney General’s announcement of his intention to bring the case to the Supreme Court in the UK, Lord Chef Justice Declan Morgan indicated the appropriate section of the Northern Ireland Act to lawyers representing the McArthur family and told them: “You need to make a decision whether you wish to pursue it.” The appeal was adjourned to allow allow the family’s legal team to examine a potential appeal option under schedule 12 of the Act.
Almost 70% of British people believe that businesses should be allowed to turn down orders that conflict with the business owner’s conscience. In a poll commissioned by the Coalition for Marriage and conducted by Com Res in the wake of the Ashers Bakery discrimination ruling, 69% of people responded that businesses should not face legal sanction for following their deeply held beliefs. The study involved 2,000 British adults who were presented with a range of differing scenarios. When asked if a Christian bakery should face court for refusing to offer a ‘support gay marriage’ cake, 65% of respondents said it should not, while 16% said it should. A similar result was gained when people were asked if a Muslim-owned printer should be punished for refusing to print cartoons of Mohammed, with 68% defending the right to decline such an order against 11% believing they should.