Portuguese President has vetoed a bill to legalise euthanasia, claiming the conditions for permitting the procedure were too vague and possibly too radical.

“The bill, in one clause, says permission for anticipated death requires a ‘fatal disease’ … but widens it elsewhere to ‘incurable disease’ even if this is not fatal, and only ‘serious disease’ in another clause,” Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa wrote on Monday.

If the criteria for legalised euthanasia has fallen below a fatal disease, the president asked if the draft law “represents a vision that is more radical and drastic than the dominant view in Portuguese society?”

Supporters of legalisation had been eager to vote through the bill in November as they fear the parliamentary arithmetic could tilt the other way after an early election, scheduled for January 30, called after the minority Socialist government suffered a defeat last month on a key budget vote.

Although pushed by the Socialist Party and the radical Left Bloc, the issue cut across the left-right divide.

The Portuguese Communist Party was firmly against decriminalising euthanasia, while the pro-business Liberal Initiative party voted in favour.

The two largest parties gave their lawmakers a free vote: A handful of Socialists voted against, while centre-right opposition leader Rui Rio voted in favour, against the vast majority of his Social Democratic Party.

A German court announced it will hear the appeal against a prohibition on silent prayer gatherings in the proximity of an abortion advisory centre.

This May, a lower court had dismissed the challenge of the leader of a prayer initiative to have restrictions on their prayer vigils lifted. Pavica Vojnović, the leader of the “40 Days for Life” group in Pforzheim, Germany, had challenged the ban on the grounds of the right to freedom of religion, assembly and speech. Her group is currently prohibited from gathering to peacefully pray in the proximity of a Pro Familia abortion advisory centre.

Experts welcomed the decision by the Administrative Court of Appeals in Mannheim, which called for the facts of the case to be established as required by the rule of law.

A new survey from the Pew Research Center revealed that many Americans held fast to their faith during the COVID-19 pandemic and don’t blame God for it or other disasters including floods, hurricanes and wildfires.

Pew researchers said they found that many Americans believe the tragedies and human suffering were happenstances — also attributable to people’s actions and the way society is structured. Researchers found that fewer Americans blamed God or questioned God’s existence because of tragedies.

Upon reading “Sometimes bad things just happen,” 44% of the survey respondents said the phrase described their views very well and 42% said it described their views somewhat well. Sixty-one percent of Americans think that suffering exists “to provide an opportunity for people to come out stronger.” In a separate questionnaire, 68% said that “everything in life happens for a reason.”

A Spanish couple has won a lawsuit in a Belgian court because an IVF clinic produced twins with the wrong genetic make-up. The parents were awarded €38,000 for “shock” and “impoverishment”.

It was the first time that a Belgian court had found that a healthy child can be the cause of loss to parents.

A previous child born to the parents had beta thalassaemia, a genetic disorder which can be corrected with a bone marrow transplant. They wanted another child who could supply healthy bone marrow – a so-called “saviour sibling”.

Doctors at the Universitair Ziekenhuis in Brussels promised to do IVF and “pre-implantation genetic diagnosis” to ensure that the second child was a suitable donor. To the parents’ dismay, however, the clinic selected an embryo which proved not to be a match. Worse still, the embryo twinned.

The parents repeated the procedure at a hospital in Madrid and the fourth child proved to be a match.

Then the parents successfully sued the Belgian hospital. The judge ruled that the Spanish couple had “wanted two or three children within their family project, but under no circumstances four”.

A Catholic Bishop has contrasted the secular character of An Post’s Christmas stamps with the more religiously inspired stamps of the UK’s Royal Mail.

Writing on social media, Bishop Denis Nulty of Kildare and Leighlin said, “As a stamp collector for years, I’m always intrigued by the design of Christmas stamps around the world, just look at what our neighbours up North and across the Irish Sea will be sending compared to what will be on our envelopes”.

He posted an Irish stamp featuring two people with party hats under a mistletoe with the word “Love”, and also one UK stamp featuring the shepherds in the hills near Bethlehem, and another, of St Joseph leading the pregnant virgin on a donkey.

Out of six designs offered by An Post, only one has a religious theme and it is the one used for international postage. It is also the only one where the word ‘Nollaig’ appears. The rest are all secular in content.

By contrast, the Royal Mail Christmas stamps are all religious.

The boy’s genetic father is British, and the Irish plaintiff was also granted a parental order under British law in 2015. The couple have a second child who has an Irish passport as his genetic father is the Irish man in the couple.

In a two-day hearing last week in the High Court, lawyers for the State said the only legitimate interpretation of the 1956 Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act is for “parent” to be defined as a child’s birth mother or genetic father.

However, the plaintiffs argued that the definition has evolved since 1956 due to developments such as the introduction of same-sex marriage in 2015. The couple said they could both be regarded as the boy’s parents. Campaigners against same-sex marriage in 2015 said demands to recognise same-sex couples as the legal parents of children would inevitably follow changing the definition of marriage.

An attempt to hijack the UK Government’s flagship Health and Care Bill with an extreme abortion proposal has failed, marking a significant victory for pro-life forces.

The lack of support for the change meant it did not even go to a vote.

There was also strong support for the three pro-life amendments to abortion legislation that were tabled to the Bill.

As these amendments were probing amendments, they were also not taken to a vote, but a large number of MPs across different parties showed their support for these amendments by signing them.

The amendments proposed a reduction to the abortion time limit, a ban on sex-selective abortion, and an end to abortion up to birth for disabilities including Down’s syndrome, cleft lip and club foot.

A 43-year-old quadriplegic man in Italy has won the approval of regional health authorities in his his bid to to avail of assisted suicide.

The man, identified only as Mario, was paralyzed in a traffic accident 10 years ago. He had initially decided to go to Switzerland, which has euthanasia laws in place, but then decided to take his case forward in Italy.

A 2019 decision by the country’s Constitutional Court found that assisted suicide was permissible when patients are able to make decisions and are in ‘overwhelming pain’, effectively legalising it. Opponents are concerned it will pave the way for vulnerable people to be put under pressure and the grounds for assisted suicide will expand, as in other countries.

In practice, however, the country’s health system lacks any kind of established pathway to request assisted suicide. Mario’s case is the first of its kind since the Constitutional Court decision, and thus stands to set an important precedent.

The latest decision by the ethical board of the health authority in the region of Marche should clear the way for the patient to go through with the assisted suicide, although the method by which it can be carried out remains to be decided.

Christian groups, a U.S. government panel and former senior U.S. diplomats are furious over US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s decision to take Nigeria off a list of countries accused of engaging in or tolerating religious persecution.

State Department officials gave no reason for the move other than saying Blinken, upon the advice of various department sections, decided Nigeria didn’t meet the legal threshold to be named as a “country of particular concern” in an annual religious freedom list released by the US Govt.

Critics, however, are calling Blinken’s move political, designed to appease an important African partner. One former diplomat called it the “revenge of the bureaucracy” at the State Department. Others questioned how it fits with the Biden administration’s claim that human rights lies at the centre of its foreign policy.

The decision is likely to enhance worries among conservatives, including many evangelical Christians, that the Biden administration — unlike the Trump administration — will de-emphasise the plight of Christians persecuted overseas.

“It’s a victory for the terrorists — it’s a defeat for anyone concerned with human rights and religious freedom,” Frank Wolf, a former GOP congressman, said about Blinken’s decision. Wolf spearheaded some of the key legislation requiring administrations to name religious freedom violators; one of the laws is named after him.

A new report into the kidnapping, forced conversion and sexual victimisation of Christian women and girls was released yesterday to mark ‘Red Wednesday’.

Catholic Bishop, Michael Nazir-Ali, called the practice an ‘endemic evil’.

The research suggested that in the countries under examination, not only are women from minority faith groups particularly susceptible to attack, but often Christian women are targeted most by militants. In Nigeria, Christians make up 95 percent of women and girls being held by Islamist extremists, and in Pakistan, it is suggested that Christians could comprise up 70 percent of minority faith girls and young women forcibly converted and married every year. Hindu girls are also a major target of kidnappings in parts of Pakistan.

Catholic charity Aid to the Church in Need’s (ACN) ‘Hear Her Cries’ report is the first of its kind to focus on the phenomenon of young women who are seized, because both their sex and religion makes them vulnerable to abduction and assault. The research, looking at the situation for religious groups in 196 countries, found that the number of incidents involving girls and women being taken from their families, raped and forced to change their faith has grown over the last few years.