A County Council in the UK is on the brink of a legal challenge over a controversial policy for implementing Relationship and Sex Education (RSE) in primary schools under its care.
Lawyers acting on behalf of The Christian Institute have written to Warwickshire Council contending it has failed to “take into account and give proper weight” to its duties under the Equality Act 2010, the Human Rights Act 1998 and the Education Act 1996.
The Council’s RSE Policy for primary schools incorporates and promotes the All About Me programme. Among its assertions are that gender identity “can be best understood as being a spectrum” and “transgender children have the right to use whichever toilet or changing room they feel most comfortable using”.
It encourages schools not to inform parents if their children are sharing rooms with transgender pupils and to conceal a child’s transgender status from their own parents – contrary to parental rights which are protected under the Human Rights Act 1998.
Whilst making no reference to marriage, it is claimed that lesson materials encourage masturbation and include “gratuitously graphic” sexual images, contrary to the Education Act 1996 and despite the lessons not being classed as sex education.
The letter warns the Council that it cannot lead schools to evade their duties under the Act “by teaching sexually explicit materials under the heading of another subject”, pointing out that “if the content is sexually explicit it must be sex education” however it is labelled.
All 15 TDs who voted against the radical abortion regime of the outgoing Government last December 2018 have been re-elected to Dáil Éireann.
On the other hand, some of the most vocal supporters of that law have lost their seats or failed to be elected as TDs.
Denise Kelly of the Pro-Life Campaign welcomed the news as “truly uplifting”.
“Some had their chances of re-election completely written off by the media, others had to overcome huge opposition within their parties because of their pro-life stance – all of them deserve our heartiest congratulations for standing up for life and prevailing”, she said.
“It is important to mention that other candidates were also elected who are solidly pro-life. Together, they have shown the leadership of the main political parties that the electorate appreciate people who stick to their principles and don’t waver under pressure”.
The pro-life TDs who voted against the abortion law and were returned to their seats are Michael Collins, IND, Cork South West; Michael Fitzmaurice, IND, Roscommon/Leitrim; Peter Fitzpatrick, IND, Louth; Noel Grealish, IND, Galway West; Michael Healy Rae, IND, Kerry, and his brother Danny Healy Rae, IND, Kerry; Michael Lowry, IND, Tipperary; Mattie McGrath, IND, Tipperary; Carol Nolan, IND, Laois-Offaly; Peadar Tóibín, Aontu, Meath West; Mary Butler, FF, Waterford; Eamon O Cuiv, FF, Galway West; John McGuinness, FF, Carlow/Killkenny; and, Marc MacSharry, FF, Sligo/Leitrim.
Pro-abortion candidates who lost election included Kate O’Connell FG; Lisa Chambers, FF; Ruth Coppinger, PBP; Minister for Social Protection, Regina Doherty, FG; Minister for Children, Katherine Zappone, Ind, and Senator Catherine Noone, Joan Burton and Jan O’Sullivan of Labour. Timmy Dooley, FF, and Noel Rock, FG.
In particular, in a new five seat constituency that amalgamated two previous three seaters, Marcella Corcoran Kennedy in Laois/Offaly, who was a outspoken supporter of repeal lost her seat to Carol Nolan who resigned from Sinn Fein due to her principled opposition to abortion. In Dún Laoghaire, Fine Gael’s Mary Mitchell O’Connor (‘pro-choice’ and pro-repeal’) failed to hold her seat, which went to pro-life TD, Cormac Devlin of Fianna Fáil.
Swiss voters agreed on Sunday to criminalise public speech considered homophobic. It is not clear exactly what the law will cover.
Voters were asked in a referendum whether laws that prohibit discrimination and incitement to hatred on the basis of religion or ethnicity should be extended to also include sexual orientation. On Sunday 63.1 percent voted in favour of the proposal. Under the amended law, ‘homophobic’ comments made in public would be punishable with fines and up to three years in prison.
The new law does not criminalise comments made in a family circle or among friends but outlaws the public denigration or discrimination of gay people or fomenting hatred against them in text, speech, images, or gestures.
This includes comments made on television, messages posted on social media, and discrimination in public venues like restaurants or movie theaters.
Lawmakers initially included wording in the bill to protect transgender people, but the Council of States, Switzerland’s higher parliamentary chamber, rejected it on the basis that the criteria were too vague.
Interior Minister Alain Berset said in a video message to voters that jokes about gay men and lesbians would still be allowed “as long as they respect human dignity.”
Pope Francis has denounced ‘gender theory’ as evil, saying the ideology seeks to erase all differences between men and women.
In an interview for a forthcoming book, Father Luigi Maria Epicoco asked Pope Francis where he sees evil at work today.
“One place is ‘gender theory,'” the pope said. It has a “dangerous” cultural aim of erasing all distinctions between men and women, male and female, which would “destroy at its roots” God’s most basic plan for human beings: “diversity, distinction. It would make everything homogenous, neutral. It is an attack on difference, on the creativity of God and on men and women.”
Pope Francis said he did not want “to discriminate against anyone”, but was convinced that human peace and well-being had to be based on the reality that God created people with differences and that accepting – not ignoring – those differences is what brings people together.
Britain should “turn the taps off” on aid to countries that fail to protect their Christian populations from persecution, a former trade minister has said.
During a Commons debate on Christian persecution, Tory Sir Edward Leigh singled out the Nigerian government and said it should be “held to account” for growing levels of targeting of worshippers and churches in parts of the country.
He added: “How are we helping when we are sending hundreds of millions of pounds to Governments that completely fail to protect their Christian citizens?
Earlier in the debate, shadow Foreign Office minister Fabian Hamilton questioned whether Britain should be beholden to countries that abuse religious groups for trade deals.
Mr Hamilton also asked for confirmation on whether the Prime Minister or Foreign Secretary has ever raised the persecution of Christian minorities within China with the authorities there.
Labour MP Lyn Brown (West Ham) said: “The protection of these rights needs to be at the heart of UK foreign policy.
“We need to do everything possible to ensure that people have the right to pursue their beliefs without fear.
A California state university has this week agreed to revise its policies and pay more than $240,000 after a federal court had found that the university had discriminated against a student pro-life group when it used mandatory student fees to fund only university-favored views.
In 2017, legal group Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) filed a lawsuit on behalf of the pro-life student group Students for Life, after California State University–San Marcos denied the group access to funding from mandatory student fees that should have been available to all student groups.
According to ADF, CSU-San Marcos has more than 100 student groups but has been discriminatory in distributing funding to those groups. In the 2016-2017 academic year, the university gave the Gender Equity Center and the LGBQTA Pride Center a combined total of $296,498, or 57 times what the other student groups were granted, which was less than $6,000.
The issue came to light in the 2016-207 school year when Students for Life was denied $500 to fund a visiting pro-life speaker, University of North Carolina–Wilmington Professor Mike Adams, who was to give a talk on “Abortion and Human Equality.” The group members had paid the same mandatory student activity fees required of all students.
A court has sanctioned Spanish abortionists for deceptive advertising, putting their public funding at risk.
According to the Association of Christian Attorneys of Spain (Abogados Cristianos), the Court of the Province of Oviedo has ruled that Association of Voluntary Pregnancy Interruption Clinics of Spain (ACAI) made deceptive claims on its website. These included: “Abortion has no consequences”, “There is no risk of infertility at all for having one or more abortions”, “Abortion represents a maturing experience for some women”, and “Those who have an abortion usually have greater self-esteem than those who refuse to end an unwanted pregnancy”.
The court demanded ACAI post on their website the court’s judgement and pay for the cost of the trial. ACAI was ordered to never repeat the false advertising.
In a statement, the Christian attorneys’ guild declared that they “will continue the process so that public funding is withdrawn from the clinics.” Polonia Castellanos, president the guild, greeted the ruling, saying that “justice has been done against an organization that has lied to many women encouraging them to abort as if they were free from serious consequences.” She emphasized that “public aid must be destined to mothers who have few resources and not to abortion employers who only seek money in the suffering of others.”
The UK’s Lord Chancellor, Robert Buckland QC, has said he has “grave doubts” about any weakening of the law against assisted suicide.
Activists have been pushing for the current protections to be removed, but many fear the vulnerable will suffer.
Now Buckland, who is Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, has expressed his personal concerns and said the Government has no plans for a review of the law.
Writing to Dr Gordon Macdonald, the CEO of pro-life group Care Not Killing, Mr Buckland said it was not the place of Government policy to dictate a change. “Personally, I have grave doubts about the ability of legislation to be watertight when it comes to the potential for abuse.
“But, as Lord Chancellor, you will understand that, whatever my personal view, I must listen to all sides of the debate on this complex issue.”
Dr Macdonald told the Institute he was “delighted” by the Lord Chancellor’s statement.
He said: “The current law works well. It balances a strong deterrent against abuse whilst allowing a compassionate response to those who are in very distressing and difficult circumstances and experiencing terminal illness.
“We do not believe that doctors should be encouraged to kill their patients or to help them to commit suicide.
“That would be a very retrograde step which would place many vulnerable people at risk of abuse and put pressure on those with terminal and chronic illnesses and on the disabled to end their lives prematurely.”
A Muslim father is being prosecuted for keeping his son off school for months in a row over teaching LGBT+ gender lessons.
Jabar ‘Jay’ Hussain, 51, faces a fine and potentially jail for failing to ensure his nine-year-old went to Parkfield Community School in Birmingham.
He claimed the school’s ‘No Outsiders’ programme was ‘incompatible’ with his rights and Muslim faith.
He alleged the lessons posed a ‘safeguarding risk’ and caused confusion for young pupils about their gender identity and the decision to prosecute him was unlawful and breached his human rights.
The mother of a seven-year-old Belfast boy with Down syndrome has urged Prime Minister Boris Johnson not to introduce abortion in Northern Ireland for babies with the condition.
Nicola Woods (34) is one of more than 1,000 people who have signed an open letter to Mr Johnson as new figures show there were 710 late-term abortions for Down syndrome in England and Wales over the last 10 years.
The letter has been backed by the Don’t Screen Us Out community, a coalition of advocacy groups, who are concerned about the scope of the Northern Ireland’s soon to be enacted abortion regime and the impact on families with Down syndrome children.
Last October an extreme abortion law was imposed on Northern Ireland by MPs at Westminster that is even more permissive than the abortion on demand law in England and Wales.
