An increasing number of babies are surviving premature birth and with less neurological problems, a new study in the United States has found. Conducted by Duke Health, the study looked at 4,272 premature births over a three-year period and found that while survival for babies born between 22 and 24 weeks for the period 2000 and 2003 was about 30%, for the period 2008-2011, the survival rate increased to 36%. The US study bears out a similar study recently released in Britain which showed significant survival rates for infants born at 23 weeks, as high as 70% in some hospitals. Dr Peter Saunders, CEO of Christian Medical Fellowship, said the increase in survival figures are “again raising serious questions about the 24 week upper limit for social abortion”. He added: “It is utterly incongruous that on the one hand we are aborting babies at gestation when others are surviving with good neonatal care…It’s time now for Parliament again to ask serious questions about late abortion.”

The European Union’s top court has ruled that employers can bar workers from wearing religious symbols in the workplace. The judgement handed down by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) states that internal company rules can be shaped so as to require ‘neutral dress’ on the part of employees. The case was centred on the experiences two women, Asma Bougnaoui in France and Samira Achbita Belgium who were fired by their companies in relation to the wearing of Muslim headscarves. However, the ruling means that a Christian employee can now be barred from wearing, for example, a cross necklace or lapel pin on the grounds of neutrality. Reacting to the judgement, Adina Portaru, Legal Counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom International said: “Nobody should be forced to choose between their religion and their profession. A court claiming to be a champion of human rights should safeguard the fundamental right to freedom of conscience, religion, and belief rather than undermining it. Citizens’ deeply held convictions should be reasonably accommodated by their employers.”

A new Bill before the British Parliament to further liberalise the country’s abortion laws will proceed to its first reading this month after a successful vote. The proposed legislation, to decriminalise abortion up to 24 weeks, would mean that instead of abortion being technically illegal without medics’ permission, there would be no criminal sanctions. The proposal passed by 174 votes to 142. The Bill was tabled by Diana Johnson MP, while abortion provider the British Pregnancy Abortion Service (BPAS) supports the Bill. Speaking on the vote’s outcome, Anne Scanlan, education director at the pro-life charity Life, said: “Ms Johnson’s position that there is no need for legal restrictions on abortion because of the presence of other parliamentary regulation and professional standards is clearly nonsense when one looks at the history of abuses in the abortion industry.”

Britain’s National Secular Society (NSS) has said that young pupils should be forced to attend lessons on homosexual relationships. Writing on the issue, the NSS campaign director, Stephen Evans added that allowing religious parents to remove their children from such classes should be deemed “unacceptable”. Evans was reacting to British government plans to include an opt-out in the proposed Relationships and Sex Education (RSE) programme for secondary schools – unlike the Relationships Education in primary schools, which will have no such element. “The government’s ‘21^st-century relationships and sex education’ will not be worthy of that billing if it allows young people’s rights to be retarded by religion,” Evans wrote, adding that schools are an “ideal place” to encourage a “sexually autonomous younger generation”, and decried a lack of “explicit reference to gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people in the proposals”. Simon Calvert, Deputy Director for Public Affairs at The Christian Institute, criticised the NSS stance. “It cannot be right to trample all over the rights of millions of Christian, Muslim and Jewish families – to do so would be to sideline freedom itself,” he said.

The Catholic Bishops of Canada have denounced plans by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s plan for a $650million fund for increased international access to abortion. In an open letter to the Canadian leader, the prelates describe the plan as “a reprehensible example of Western cultural imperialism” that “exploits women”. Mr Trudeau used International Women’s Day to announce that his government will commit the funds over the next three years to “address gaps in sexual and reproductive health and rights in the world’s poorest and most vulnerable communities”. The Bishops wrote that the move not only “negates our country’s laudable efforts to welcome refugees and offer protection to the world’s homeless…[but] your policy and vision, contrary to the fundamental ethic of protecting the most vulnerable and assisting the weakest, are in conflict with the principles instinctively shared by the majority of the world’s population and consistently upheld by the Catholic Church: to defend and protect human life from conception to natural death.”

A Bill which sought to reduce the penalty for procuring an abortion in Ireland from 14 years in prison to €1 has been defeated in the Dáil. The vote to strike down the legislation, tabled by Bríd Smith of the Alliance Against Austerity-People Before Profit, was carried by 81 votes to 26. Opposed by the Fine Gael Party, members of Fianna Fáil were allowed a vote of conscience, but in the end just three members voted in favour of the Bill: Stephen Donnelly, Lisa Chambers and Billy Kelleher. On the issue of a referendum on the Eighth Amendment, soon to be the subject of recommendations from the Citizens’ Assembly to the Dáil,Tánaiste and Minister for Justice Frances Fitzgerald has suggested that should a referendum be recommended,  it would be next year before any such poll would take place.

Pro-life groups in Britain have called on the government to shut down Marie Stopes International (MSI) clinics after a Daily Mail exposé of questionable practices. Both the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC) and Life issued a joint petition urging immediate action after an undercover reporter found that clinics were willing to alter patient application  forms so as to be seen to conform with the Abortion At of 1967, with doctors ‘assessing’ women by phone before recommending terminations. “In view of their appalling treatment of women, and recognising that every abortion takes the life of an unborn baby, Life and SPUC call on the Secretary of State for Health to withdraw from MSI their licence to carry out abortions.” SPUC executive director John Smeaton added: “It is a matter of fact that 98 percent of abortions are certified on mental health grounds when the government’s own evidence shows that there’s no real risk to the woman’s mental or physical health if she has the baby. In these circumstances, these abortions are illegal.”

The Pro Life Campaign (PLC) has said the latest call from a United Nations committee on Ireland to legislate for abortion is damaging the international body’s reputation. In a new report from the UN’s Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW), it expresses concern that “access to abortion in the State [Ireland] is restricted to cases where there is a real and substantial risk to the life of the pregnant woman under the Protection of Life During Pregnancy Act 2013 …” The PLC has responded that CEDAW “in effect calls for the overturning of all meaningful protections for the unborn child under the Eighth Amendment…The purpose of the CEDAW committee is to highlight and seek to eliminate discrimination. Abortion, however, is the ultimate discrimination as it targets the most vulnerable in society, namely unborn babies.” The pro-life group went on to accuse UN committees like CEDAW of losing “all credibility as defenders of authentic human rights” and in recent years becoming “cheerleaders” for the abortion movement.

Two more US states have officially recognised pornography as a “public health crisis”. Virginia and South Dakota have become the latest jurisdictions to acknowledge that the use and proliferation of porn as reaching “crisis” levels. This comes after the state of Utah made similar declarations in 2016. The Virginia State House voted overwhelmingly to pass a resolution expressing concerns over the damaging effects it has on its users. In South Dakota, there were unanimous votes in both the House and Senate. Groups working against pornography have welcomed the state moves, with the National Centre for Sexual Exploitation noting that they will “pave the way for greater awareness and national dialogue on the issue”.