New proposals concerning surrogacy in the Netherlands could mean up to four “parents” would have legal rights to one child.
The Country’s ruling coalition parties have proposed that the government should provide certain protections in gestational surrogacy arrangements and, separately, should provide some recognition of rights for non-biological parents, leading to a multiplicity of “parents”.
The Netherlands wouldn’t be the first governmental entity to recognize certain parental rights for up to four people. For instance, Ontario, Canada, passed a parentage law in 2016 that allows for up to four parents to a child. And based on one reading of recent New York State case law, the Empire State arguably permits up to six parents to a single child. The proposed legal changes in the Netherlands are intended to address current problems whereby step-parents, foster parents, and other non-biologically related persons acting as parents, nevertheless have no rights to a child.
The French government has sent draft legislation to parliament that would allow in-vitro fertilization (IVF) for lesbian couples and single women. Ireland already permits this. Countries such as Germany, Austria and Italy do not.
The bioethics bill, which would also allow women to freeze their eggs for non-medical reasons, is the first major societal reform by centrist President Emmanuel Macron. It was delayed while anti-government “yellow vest” protests roiled the country. Only six years ago, former President Francois Hollande’s legislation allowing gay marriage faced strong opposition.
While female same-sex couples would be enabled to have children through this legislation, male couples still won’t have any such pathway as surrogacy will remain banned, with the government deeming the issue too incendiary. “It would have raised the issue of the commercialization of women’s bodies,” Buzyn said.
The bill also ends anonymity for sperm donors, who will have to agree to having their identity revealed if their children ask to know their biological father when they turn 18.
Most Americans are still familiar with some of the basics of Christianity and the Bible, according to a new Pew Research Center survey that quizzed nearly 11,000 U.S. adults on a variety of religious topics.
The survey asked 32 fact-based, multiple-choice questions about topics related to religion. It is similar to a poll commissioned by The Iona Institute in 2007 which examined levels of basic knowledge among Irish people about Christianity and Catholicism.
Some of the questions were meant to be relatively easy, to establish a baseline indication of what nearly all Americans know about religion. Others were intended to be difficult, to differentiate those who are most knowledgeable about religious topics from everyone else.
Overall, eight-in-ten U.S. adults correctly answer that in the Christian tradition, Easter commemorates the resurrection of Jesus – rather than the Crucifixion, the Ascension to heaven or the Last Supper. A similar share know that the Christian doctrine of the Trinity holds that there is one God in three persons – the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. Eight-in-ten Americans correctly identify Moses as the biblical figure who led the Exodus from Egypt, and David as the one who killed Goliath by slinging a stone, while seven-in-ten know that Abraham is the biblical figure who exhibited a willingness to sacrifice his son in obedience to God.
Authorities are investigating why not one girl was born across dozens of villages in a northern Indian district in the last three months. In a country grappling with a skewed gender ratio, data has revealed that of the 216 newborns in 132 villages across the Uttarkashi district, in Uttarakhand state, none were girls, the news agency ANI reported.
It raises concerns that the central government’s policy to try to tackle the prevalence of sex-selective abortion, is not working.
India outlawed the selective abortion of female fetuses in 1994 but it is still a common practice in a country where dowries for girls, although outlawed, are expensive and boys are considered to be the main breadwinners.
Census data in 2011 showed there were 914 girls to every 1,000 boys for children up to the age of six, but in some northern states that ratio was as low as 850, according to the United Nations Population Fund UNFPA).
Last year, a government report found about 63 million women were “missing” from the country’s population. “Issues relating to son preference are a matter for Indian society as a whole to reflect upon,” the report said.
Nine in ten Irish people underestimate the monetary value of a stay-at-home parent which has been estimated at nearly €44,000.
This is one of the primary findings of a recent survey from protection specialist Royal London, which found the average salary value people would place on the role of a stay-at-home mother or father was €27,500, while wage figure estimates suggest the actual amount could be nearly €44,000.
Royal London considered the duties of a stay-at-home parent and researched the cost of replacing the jobs they do for the family and in the home. They included some of the ‘top jobs’ parents carry out on a weekly basis such as cooking, cleaning, driving children to their various activities and so on, and the average work-place costs associated with these duties. Royal London’s calculations reveal that the cost to employ someone to do the household jobs normally done by a stay-at-home parent would be an estimated €43,934.
Ms. Murphy spoke of the contrast between perception and reality when it comes to remuneration for the myriad of jobs carried out by a stay-at-home parent: “The average expected salary of €27,500 is significantly lower than the €43,934 we estimate as the economic cost of a stay-at-home parent, and lower again than the €47,596 reported by the CSO as the average earnings of a person in full time employment during 2018.”
The BBC grossly exaggerated the actual number of women in the UK who had ordered illegal abortion pills online from overseas according to data released as a result of a Freedom Of Information request by Right To Life UK.
BBC coverage from 2017 implied that increasingly large numbers of individual women were directly ordering abortion pills from website overseas. This in turn suggested that there had been an increased demand from individual women for illegal abortion pills over a number of years.
However, the BBC’s presentation of the facts was extremely misleading. They disclosed the total number of abortion pills that have been seized each year since 2013, but failed to disclose that only one or two parcels of abortion pills had actually been seized each year.
So, instead of the hundreds of individuals apparently illegally ordering abortion pills online, the Freedom of Information request showed only a handful of individuals had ordered parcels containing abortion pills.
The British parliament has voted to force the UK Government to radically liberalise access to abortion and permit same-sex marriage in Northern Ireland if devolution is not restored by October 21.
The landmark legislation passed through its final stage at Westminster yesterday.
The changes were passed as part of measures aimed at keeping Northern Ireland public services running, two and a half years after devolved powersharing collapsed.
In Northern Ireland, the votes were welcomed by the Alliance party and the SDLP, but rejected by the more pro-life Unionists.
Nigel Dodds, the Democratic Unionist party (DUP) leader in Westminster, warned before the votes that they would drive “a coach and horses through the principle of devolution”.
The votes could also affect efforts to revive the executive and assembly at Stormont. While Naomi Long, the Alliance leader, said they could unlock the talks, others speculated that Sinn Féin, which supports social liberalisation, now has an incentive to delay the restoration of devolution to let the amendments take effect.
Fianna Fáil “would not oppose” the referral of assisted suicide to a Citizens’ Assembly for further discussion, a spokesperson has told the Medical Independent.
“This is a long-standing issue and an informed discussion of the issues surrounding it is of merit.”
They added that it was “vital” any further debate on the issue was respectful and informed and “previous Citizens’ Assemblies have achieved this”.
However, a Fine Gael spokesperson did not provide its position on a recommendation by the Joint Committee on Justice and Equality, which urged the Oireachtas to “consider” referring the issue to the Citizens’ Assembly. The recommendation was made in the Committee’s Report on the Right to Die With Dignity, published in June 2018.
Fine Gael’s spokesperson described “assisted suicide as “a very complex issue”.
They added: “The competing interests of the individual would have to be balanced with the wider public interest in safeguarding persons who are nearing the end of their lives and who might be vulnerable and at risk of abuse. As such, the Minister for Justice and Equality Charlie Flanagan has no plans to review the existing legislation.”
Some doctors are not just conscientiously objecting to abortion – they are actively obstructing the provision of abortion in the hospitals where they work. That’s according to Minister for Health Simon Harris who made the claim in an interview with joe.ie last week.
“In some hospitals, conscientious objection has actually become obstruction whereby people are – in a very small number and I don’t want to overegg this – but in a very small number I do believe there are some doctors in our hospitals who are gone beyond their own conscientious objection to actually trying to obstruct the establishment of a service,” he said.
“And that’s not on, I’m not going to tolerate it, the HSE is not going to tolerate it, and the Government is not going to tolerate it either. So any doctor has the right to opt out, but that’s very different to hearing doctors standing up at rallies saying the service will never be provided in their hospital. Because you know what, its not their hospital, its our hospital and a hospital for the women of Ireland”.
He apparently was referring to a speech given by Consultant Obstetrician at St Luke’s Kilkenny General Hospital, Dr Trevor Hayes, at the recent Rally for Life in Dublin. Dr Hayes said he and other prolife doctors would not be bullied or forced into performing or facilitating abortions. He also asked if politicians who are attacking pro-life doctors would be willing to perform an abortion themselves.
Mr Harris continued by outlining a way he could circumvent the opposition of frontline obstetricians.
“I do obviously have the powers to direct the HSE to provide services as well. And that’s certainly an option that I’m going to keep available that if we can’t have services provided through the natural way of asking people to provide them in certain parts of the country that we can actually put in a direct HSE staff resource into that part of the country”.
“So I would rather not do that, I would rather continue to win the argument that our healthcare professionals would respect the will of the Irish people through their vote, but that is certainly an option”.
The vast majority of Irish people would support the introduction of mandatory online registration to stop under-18s from accessing internet pornography.
A Behaviour & Attitudes (B&A) poll for The Sunday Times found 85% were in favour of a system whereby anybody wishing to view pornography on the internet would have to verify they were an adult by using a recognised form of identification, such as a credit card, passport or driving licence.
Only 5% opposed such a registration scheme. The undecided and those with no opinion accounted for 10%.
Britain has legislated for an age verification system, also known as an age gate, with the passage of the Online Pornography (Commercial Basis) Regulations 2019, but it has not yet come into force because of technical hitches and data protection concerns.
There have been calls in Ireland for a similar law after evidence was given at the trial for the murder of Ana Kriegel that Gardai found thousands of images of pornography on the phone of one of the convicted boys, some of which depicted sexual violence. There had also been internet searches for “child porn” and “animal porn” on the phone.
